Saturday, June 2, 2012

Feed me

This is the best book series on the planet. As a former journalist and lifelong horror afficianado, strong enough words do not exist to convey how much I love this series, or how strongly I feel that if you have not read it, you should just drop everything, right now - stop reading this post, run, not walk, to your local Barnes and Noble and buy it. All of it. Right now. And read it. Or, if, like me, you're more the immediate gratification type, you can download it from iTunes. There are a couple of neat extras too, that McGuire has done. But we won't bother with that now. Just read the series, and come back and talk to me when you do.

To be clear, we're talking about the so-called 'Newsflesh' series, which starts with the book Feed and continues through Deadline and Blackout, all by Mira Grant. Mira Grant isn't really Mira Grant though, but a pseudonym for Seanan McGuire. I'm more than a little starstruck by McGuire, who is roughly my age, but who has managed to produce a prolific output of quality novels under both her own name and the Grant pseudonym, as well as contribute to a variety of filk albums. And, what is personally cool to me - she knows an old friend of mine from college/the SCA. That's the part that makes me squee a little bit, that she's a fellow SCAdian, and a friend of a friend, not just, dare I say, one of the greatest authors living today.

I know that's an extreme statement for a body of work that is (gasp!) genre - that is to say, about something - unquestionably telling a fictional story, something that appears to be frowned upon in literary circles. At the very least, it appears to cut you out of the immediate running for serious consideration by say, the list of this month's best works in Vanity Fair, or a number of literary prizes. And if you write fantasy and horror, it makes your English Composition professor send back your paper with a lot of silly criticism, as if the mere act of telling a story rather than writing a veiled confessional is somehow suspect. But to tell a story, one that couldn't happen now, circumstances being what they are, and make the reader believe that, given the right circumstances, it could, and that, furthermore, its telling reveals fundamental things about our own society, and about human nature, and moves you, as a reader, makes you care whether these people, who have ceased to become characters, but are people, friends even, whether these fully fleshed people live or die - that's when you've done something right. That makes you great. McGuire is great. Or Grant. Whichever she prefers.

Feed is a zombie tale, in the vein of 28 Days Later - fast, virus-ridden zombies. She takes time with her science - of course, I'm a former lit major, not a scientist, but as an armchair scientist, her theories sounded entirely plausible. In the bad future, where all good tales these days take place, two scientists perfect two cures, one for cancer, and one for the common cold, and through a series of events I won't go into, infect the entire human population. Or, inoculate them, if you will. The cures work by introducing viruses into the body that attack the cancer/cold. Unfortunately, when they combine, they also turn you into a zombie. Not all the time, because just as viruses work in the real world, the mere fact of having a virus present in your body does not make you symptomatic all the time. Think HIV. But like HIV, when the viral load of Grant's Kellis-Amberlee virus reaches a critical mass in your system and overcomes your natural defenses, you become sick. In this case, you amplify - i.e. become a zombie. So...zombie virus is unleashed...fast-forward 20 years. What happens to the world after that?

That was the most amazing aspect of the series. So often, the initial event of a story is where the story starts and ends. But life isn't like that. Events have repercussions. The interesting bit of a story isn't the action - not that there isn't action in this book. There is, and plenty of it. It's going to be a hell of a movie. I think of Dollhouse, at the end, when all the shit was going down. And, in the case of the third book, of Neon Genesis Evangelion. Which hopefully isn't too much of a spoiler. It probably isn't, unless you're a giant nerd, like me. But when was the last time a monster novel dealt with, not just the science, but the political implications? The social implications? Ooh, and did I mention the zombie bears?

It's good. You'll like it. Trust me.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

The Weird of Food

This is incredibly cool. Now the question is, do they make waffle doll irons to go with the furniture? In other news...argh!!! What have they done to Blogger? And where are my stats on the Dashboard? Why does 'new' and especially 'streamlined' always mean worse?

Friday, April 6, 2012

Chocolate eggs, deconstructed



While browsing Reddit the other day, I came across a link to this post, by the exceptionally talented (or should I say 'egg-ceptionally'?) Steph, a food blogger from Sydney. I couldn't wait to try it out, and make my own chocolate cheesecake eggs for a party tomorrow. Since I didn't know where to buy hollow chocolate eggs on short notice, I decided to buy a dozen Cadbury eggs, cut them open, and hollow them out.

Here's what I learned: this does not work. You can't cut the top off smoothly without causing the entire egg to collapse. Or if you do manage, you will find that the filling is pretty much an integral part of the not-so-hollow-as-it-first-appeared egg. So...I decided to deconstruct it.

And that brings us to today's post - Deconstructed 'fried egg' cheesecake tartlets.

Here's what you need:
For filling -
8 oz cream cheese
1/3 cup powdered sugar (confectioner's sugar)
1/2 tsp. lemon juice
1/2 tsp. vanilla
1/2 cup heavy whipping cream

Not for filling -
7 graham cracker tartlets (alas, this is all that it makes. Feel free to double the recipe though!)
apricot jam (I used Smucker's Spreadable Fruit)

Put all the filling stuff in a bowl and beat it with an electric mixer until it is uniformly smooth. It should taste like no-bake cheesecake (because that's what it is!). Fill the tartlet shells. Use an ice cream spoon or other very small teaspoon to make a round scooped depression in the center of each tartlet. Put a small dollop of jam in that depression, so that they look like eggs, sunny side up. See how easy that was? It takes ten minutes, tops, and tastes delicious! Next year I plan to buy chocolate shells and try Steph's version, but in the meantime, I'm pretty pleased with the way these turned out. It just goes to show, there are no mistakes in cooking that you can't turn into something great. Happy Easter, everyone!

Monday, April 2, 2012

The coolest language learning site ever



Lately I've been trying to learn Spanish because, in contrast to my previous home state of Ohio, I now live in an area where a lot of people speak Spanish, and it just doesn't make any sense to me not to be able to communicate with all of the people around you. So, I like, when I have the time, to search out new and exciting ways to learn languages. Changing things up keeps them interesting. Years ago, I used this site,eTandem, to find a French pen pal, and it really did help a lot with my French, not to mention just being fun - it's not often, as an adult, you get the chance to have a pen pal, something most of us left behind in elementary school. [Viktor from Russia, wherever you are, I hope you're doing well ;) ]

But back to eTandem. After using it once, I then lost the address for years, and for some reason, Yahoo and Google searches do not turn it up, or at least they didn't for me. I think it was because I forgot the crucial 'e'. 'Tandem foreign language penpal' didn't cut it. And now, here it is again! I'm excited to be able to use it, and I thought I'd take this opportunity to tell the rest of you about it. What is it, you ask? Well, it's a free penpal matching service that asks you a few questions (age, country, language you know, language you'd like to know, how good you are at it already), and uses that info to pair you with someone who commits to writing to you in your respective languages (and possibly communicating in other ways too, if you're up for it and you both agree - such as letter, phone, chat, or video chat). Anyway, it's fun and free, and it deserves to be more commonly known about. So, give it a try, if it sounds like your cup of tea. Why let all those high school language classes go to waste?

Monday, March 26, 2012

In lieu of a thousand words




I found these amazing pictures online today on Google Earth, and I thought I'd share them with you. The link is not behaving for me at this moment, but if you would like to see more of this artist's incredible work, it is available at: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/30014276

Friday, March 23, 2012

A free ride

Today I come before you, citizens of the world, but especially of Fort Collins, with a plea: save our bike library! Let me explain - for the past few years - I'm not sure how many, because I've been away for quite a few of them, and when I last lived here, the place in question was an ice cream shop - for the past few years, Fort Collins, Colorado, has been blessed with something particularly awesome, and completely unique, as far as I'm aware - a bicycle lending library. If you stop by our bike library, you are allowed, no matter your age, income, or place of residence, to check out a bicycle in Old Town, Fort Collins, and ride it all over town for as long as five days, for, get this, absolutely nothing. No cost. No catch. That's it. Have you ever heard of such a thing? Unfortunately, the grant that makes this possible is coming to an end, as all good things do, in all too little time. The city is now asking interested parties to submit a survey, so that they will have some idea how widely the library is used and appreciated. They are asking scary questions like, "Should a fee structure be put into place, how should fees be calculated - hourly, weekly, etc.?" In short, I am afraid that they are about to ruin everything that is good about it. Please don't let this happen! I think the bike library is invaluable. It is good for the environment. It is good for tourism. It gives a not inconsequential bit of very needed help to the city's homeless population. And, not to be overlooked, it is fun! I hate to see it go!

I realize most of you probably don't live in Fort Collins, but if you do, or plan to visit, or just enjoy filling out surveys, please let the city know how important this program is!

Friday, March 9, 2012

Cool book alert



I picked up this book at the library this week, and it is so cool that I have to tell you all about it. It is basically an ambitious attempt to pair every possible flavor in the world with every other flavor in the world. It is written by a Brit, and many of the suggestions make that obvious, as well as a kind of innate sense of taste (not tastefulness, but regional preference that seems English) - for example, milk chocolate and mint, one of my own favorite combinations, is scorned like the devil, but a few tasty dark chocolate and mint combos are substituted instead. Puddings also outnumber cakes, and main courses tend to favor the traditional two categories of English cooking - meat-and-veg-of-questionable-health-content (e.g. fish and chips; things that would be found in breakfast fry-ups) and curry (or things that make you think of curry).

That being said, I like curry and puddings, and there really are a lot of creative suggestions in the book. While it is true that the things I just mentioned feature prominently, they are by no means everything that is included - that's just the starting point of reference. And almost as much fun as the author's suggestions is the opportunity to come up with your own as you page through the book, and are reminded of all the possible combinations through recipes, restaurant dish suggestions, or quintessential grocery items (I was gratified to see that she did mention the Reese's cup when she got to chocolate and peanut, as I have it on good authority from a close English friend that chocolate and peanut butter are not a typical British combination - chocolate and peanuts, perhaps - but this friend, at least, claims to find chocolate and peanut butter disgusting, not the source of lots of creamy, pleasantly contrasting, goodness I know it to be.).

Anyway, if you have the opportunity to peruse this book, you should. It's very creative, and highly entertaining. Makes you think about cooking more as a craft. That's the secret of cooking as an art, I think - we should do whatever encourages us to play with our food more often.

On that note - two more random items that I've seen lately and I would love to have. Yay, toys! Kitchen toys, that is:



Ok, this one may be all packaging. Look! You can make your own Harry Potter food! But what you really need to make your own Harry Potter food is this:


You, too, can make your own chocolate frogs. Did I mention that at Amazon, it's only $2.45? I did now!

And if you are not in a buying frame of mind, at least check out this flavor wheel, courtesy of The Taste Thesaurus:

Monday, February 20, 2012

Kids these days

Another thing that I do online is review books (you may have noticed some of these reviews on the sidebar, in the LibraryThing box). I've just finished reviewing this month's selection, and as I did so, I realized that I really had more to say, not necessarily about the book, but about parenting books in general, and a blog being the perfect place to air your unsolicited opinions, I thought that I'd post it here instead.

The book in question was called Working Parents, Thriving Families. As a working parent, I picked it up, expecting a few time management tips, maybe. As it turned out, it was more of a dissertation on How You Should Parent. I found the author's style of parenting to be a little intense in places, though I'm not sure whether the fault lies with him or me. For example, in a section on how "to monitor our children well", he mentions an'unhealthy' thing that a friend's boys (aged 11 and 12) had wanted to do. What was this unhealthy action? Was it sneaking off to an R-rated movie? Was it forgoing supper in favor of cake and soda? Nope. It was jumping on a trampoline with no protective fencing around it. Egad! How will the boy survive to turn 13? I found myself thinking, "Seriously? In my day, no one had ever heard of protective fencing, and yet, somehow, we survived."

The thing I find unpalatable about parenting books is that eventually, so many of them come down to this 'us vs. them' mentality, where kids exist merely to 'push the boundaries' and parents exist merely to draw the lines. Shouldn't you see your child as a person? Don't you remember what it was like to be 11? Would it kill that 12 year old to see the PG-13 film? You know that your child is going to grow up and realize that the entire world has unfortunately not been created by Pixar, right? Do you always make healthy choices? Why is it somehow perfectly ok, in our culture, to insist on allowing your children only to eat fruit leather for a snack, cut their juice with water because, "you know, juice is so sugary"...and then chow down on Oreos yourself after they go to bed?

Don't you think that the key to good parenting ought to be communication? Don't you think that we should be less focused on creating an environment where our child can never come to harm, even if we are not paying attention, and more focused on teaching our child about the world around them, on being a part of our child's life so that they feel they can talk to us in a collaborative way - so that they are neither totally sheltered nor without guidance? To protect too much is to create a Sleeping Beauty situation. If Sleeping Beauty's parents had told her about the spinning wheel, she would have known how not to prick her finger. In the same way, if you never jump without a net, how do you know to avoid falling?

If you treat parenting like a general going to war you'll have very well-behaved, clean, appropriate kids. But if so many things are forbidden, either the lure of the forbidden becomes so much stronger, or their natural curiosity is quenched. I'm not sure which is worse. What seems the biggest shame, if you view parenting as a tactical, practical task, is that you miss out, to a certain extent, on knowing your children as people.

That's not to say that you shouldn't have rules. Many rules are important - 10 hours of sleep per night, don't hit your brother, etc. But I suppose I am afraid if I do as Mr. Palmiter suggests and "assess visits to another child's home", for instance, discouraging interactions with kids whose parents are late to pick them up or 'seem disorganized', or who fail to call while your child is visiting them...well, who would that leave, exactly, in the good camp? If all parents evaluated by that standard, I know I wouldn't ever have visited anybody as a child. On time was not my parents' strong suit. Nevertheless, they were very good parents.

What do you think, o blog reader? Am I being too hippified here, for lack of a better word? Of course I realize that there's a distinction between the parent and the child, and I do have the last word. At the same time, while I want my child to grow up to be safe, I find it distasteful that 'safe' appears to be the number one American virtue at the moment. Sure, I want my daughter to be safe. But I want her to be able to think for herself, stand up for herself and for others, if they need it. I want her to question, and to explore. I want her not to be afraid to be friends with the late kid, or the kid whose mom packed the Twinkies, or even the kid who has terrible parents - because terrible parents are not terrible children, and nobody deserves to be written off for the sins of others. I want her not to take things at face value. Someday I'm not going to be there. But she will still be around. I don't want her to lose her way then, because I did all her thinking for her. What do you think?

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Weekend at the Movies


I saw The Woman in Black yesterday at the theatre. It was a very fun movie. It also has Harry Potter in it (Daniel Radcliffe). Though if you go to see movies because Harry Potter is in them and will admit it, you are likely younger than I. This one, based on a Susan Hill novel that became a play (in fact, the second longest-running play in the history of West End theatre - you can still see it today), is edge-of-your seat scary. It's an Edwardian ghost story with all the trappings. Harry, sorry, I mean Daniel, plays a handsome young British lawyer who is sent to a remote country estate to 'put some papers in order' - a task that has been shorthand for 'be tormented by supernatural baddies and suspicious townspeople', since Bram Stoker's day.

This movie just happens to also be a Hammer Film, so be prepared to jump. They didn't miss a trick - scary old house with things lurking in the shadows around every corner, faces that disappear, the scariest dolls I've maybe ever seen, and dead children in abundance. Ok, you probably aren't thinking "Yes! Dead kids!" And if you are, please send me your full name, description and address, and I promise I won't forward it immediately to the police station nearest your house. But all of the best scary movies have dead kids in them. The Shining. The Ring. The Others. Probably a plethora of other movies starting with "The". But this plays on very primal fears - our inability to protect the defenseless. The idea that kids (and maybe animals) see things that adults cannot, so really we are the defenseless ones. The idea that despite our best efforts to protect them, some people (even our children!) maybe won't ultimately want to be saved (just look at Whitney Houston for a recent example of this). And of course, no matter how cute they were before, if they've just come out of the graveyard and are blue, dripping wet, and rattling your doorknob, you really won't want to let them in. (But what to do about the wet footprints that you see already inside, once the door has been secured?)

There is nary a moment of downtime, so drinks at the theatre are not recommended. If you go to the bathroom during the movie, you will miss a crucial plot point or a big scare. And this is probably schlock horror, to be sure, so the scares are sometimes cheap, but isn't that why we go to a film like this? If that's your cup of tea, it's well worth the price of admission.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

A friendly debate

What do you think, dear readers, about debate? Should you debate your friends? Can you debate your friends, and still remain friendly, or does it lead to hard feelings?

Personally, I've always liked a good, spirited debate, and I never expect others to agree with me since I am in fact, the polar opposite of the person who can sell ice to an Eskimo, no pun intended. If I went in for an umbrella because it was raining, the rest of the world would take their raincoats off. So, I don't mind a good debate. I enjoy talking, and I enjoy hearing what others have to say. But I'm always afraid that someday I will go too far.

It seems like in our present culture - or maybe in any culture, at any time - but it seems like we are especially polarized these days, with the 99% and the 1%, or the right wing and the left wing, people petitioning for gay marriage and people petitioning against it, pro-lifers and pro-choicers, etc. - it seems like now more than ever, you are the sum total of your opinions, and it is not ok to sympathize with a position you yourself do not hold, or to play devil's advocate. So I am always afraid, when I find myself jumping in feet first to a spirited debate (as I did on Facebook earlier today) both because I like to argue and because I hate it when it seems that one side or another is underrepresented, that I will take it too far, that my friends will come to see me as voicing my inflexible opinion, not as another side of the question we haven't considered, but as a vote against them. Or that my next argument will be taken less seriously because as we often hear on the internet, people like to surround themselves with an 'echo chamber' when they are online, to a certain extent. Of course, I have very intelligent, reasonable friends - maybe even more reasonable than me, most of the time, and I'm sure that I'm overthinking this. But what do you think? Is debate fun? Can it go too far?

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Sugar free candy that packs a big punch

I'm just here with the family watching the Super Bowl (go Giants!) and helping Bella get rid of some extra candy - parenting is hard work, right? And I was reflecting just how awesome this candy is - you can't even tell it's sugar free! Usually that saccharine taste kind of overwhelms a sugar free candy, but despite being calorie and carb free, Ice Breaker Sours are still full of flavor. And I swear they didn't even pay me to say it. But I think it's a good thing, when your child has diabetes, to seek out things that will allow them to eat relatively healthy while still feeling like a normal kid. And this fills the bill.

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Let Them Eat Cake



My dad's birthday was this past week, and I have to say that I think the cake I made for the occasion turned out pretty well! It's very rich, with a chocolate ganache-type frosting. I think this photo does a good job of illustrating its chocolaty excellence, even if it also highlights my less than stellar decorating abilities. While I aim for decorating perfection, the ultimate goal is to have it disappear so fast you don't have time to look, right?

Chocolate Truffle Torte

For cake:
6 oz semisweet chocolate chips (1 cup)
1/2 cup margarine or butter
1/2 cup flour
4 eggs, separated
1/2 cup sugar
2 1/2 oz. hazelnuts, finely chopped and toasted (if you live in Pennsylvania, some people call these filberts)
chocolate chips

For frosting:
12 oz semisweet chocolate chips
1/4 cup margarine
1/2 cup heavy whipping cream

Preheat oven to 325F. Grease bottoms and sides of 2 round cake pans (if you use disposable cake pans, the cakes come out very easily, which is nice).

Melt chocolate chips and margarine in heavy saucepan over medium heat, stirring constantly. Cool 5 minutes. Stir in flour until smooth. Stir in egg yolks until well blended.

Beat egg whites in large bowl with mixer on high speed til foamy. Beat in sugar gradually until soft peaks form. Fold chocolate mixture into egg whites. Fold in toasted hazelnuts. Spread in pans.

Bake 25 minutes, or until toothpick inserted in the middle of cake comes out clean. Cool 5 minutes. Run knife around edge of pan to loosen, then take out of pans. Cool completely.

Prepare frosting by heating chocolate chips and margarine in heavy saucepan over low heat, stirring constantly, until chocolate is melted; remove from heat. Stir in cream. Refrigerate 30 to 40 minutes until it achieves the texture of frosting. If you haven't made frosting before, try picking up a bit of it on your knife. If it drips off, it's still not ready. If it is too thick, and you think you couldn't spread it on anything to save your life, without ending up with more cake on your knife than icing on the top of the cake, then throw it in the microwave for 10 seconds or so (not in the metal pan!) until it is spreadable.

Ice the bottom layer. Top with other layer and frost top and sides of cake with remaining filling. Drizzle with any leftover filling and garnish with chocolate chips.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Why the Green Hornet Beats the Green Lantern, in My Book (and what they both have on today's Batman)

I'm just watching the five million previews before the beginning of the movie Salt, and I wondered, dear blog reader - who is your favorite superhero lately? I wondered this because they had a preview for The Green Hornet, reminding me why I like him so much, especially compared to The Dark Knight's Batman, or any number of Superman retreads. Here's why:

1. The Green Hornet is a guy. More than that, a believable guy. He's not a person-shaped alien who can fly through space, his skin doesn't turn green or silver at will, and he doesn't spend his time trying to track down weird baddies with skulls for heads, or eight mechanical arms. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But I think a touch of reality makes any display of superheroism more super. Like the tv show Heroes, when it first started.

2. Awesome gadgets. Especially the car. In fact - human origins and cool gadgets remind me of another standout superhero of late - Iron Man. And that reminds me of a third thing that the Green Hornet and Iron Man (as played by Robert Downey Jr.) have in common.

3. They're funny. Not like brooding Batman, who nowadays has Heath Ledger's psycopathic Joker to keep him company, rather than Jack Nicholson's, who treated the role like a kid with a flair for showmanship. Heath Ledger's Joker wasn't having any fun when he made that last Batman. And neither was I, watching it.

4. This leads me to the only flaw I see in the glut of superhero movies these days. They take themselves so seriously. I'm not sure I'm watching for The Origin Story to End All Origin Stories. Or superhero as social commentary. Scratch that - I'm all for social commentary. But I'd rather watch The Daily Show than read an academic treatise on the inner workings of Congress. Similarly - if I'm going to have a seemingly escapist work of art present some new truths about life, I'd rather discover that for myself rather than have said artwork metaphorically jump up and down in front of me saying, "Look! Look! Now do I deserve an Oscar?"

Superheroes still come from comic books. And I know that comic books are Graphic Novels now, and adults read them, and they buy them in bound volumes, and they keep them carefully arranged in their plastic sleeves, and they never, ever, ever let anyone touch them with dirty hands, or dog ear the pages, because they are important (and besides that, they are books, and we are adults, and we don't do that to books!) But before all of that, they were supposed to be fun. Escapist even. And just because we are adults doesn't mean we stopped having fun. So, while I may take care with my friends' comics when I read them, when I go to the movies I still want to have fun.

Monday, January 23, 2012

A bell(e) of a dessert



Bella made this dessert for her school group today, and it was so delicious I had to share it. It's called a pavlova, and it's an Australian dessert - named for the dancer Anna Pavlova, I think because it's 'light and airy, like a ballerina on her toes', not after Pavlov - although if I think it would work very well for operant condition - one slice of this, and I might do anything you ask.

Pavlova

4 egg whites
pinch of salt
1 cup of sugar
1/2 tsp. vanilla extract
3/4 tsp. white vinegar
1 cup of heavy whipping cream
1 kiwi or other fruit of your choice

Using an electric mixer, beat egg whites with salt until soft peaks form. Add 1/3 cup of sugar and beat until sugar is dissolved and mixture is very thick. Add remaining sugar one or two tablespoons at a time, beating well after each addition. When sugar is dissolved and mixture is very stiff, beat in vanilla and vinegar. The mixture should be thick and glossy.

Spoon into a smallish pie dish, ideally about 7" across. Smooth the top.

Bake for 1 1/2 hours on 250 degrees Fahrenheit. Meringue should be firm to the touch. Turn off the oven and allow to cool in the oven. I did this overnight.

In a chilled bowl, whip heavy cream until stiff. Spread the whipped cream over the top of the pavlova. Slice the kiwi and arrange on top.

Ours was eaten too fast to photograph, since we were previously unaware of its awesomeness, but here is another picture for you that looks a lot like ours did - with yet another topping idea.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Different, not less



Yesterday I watched a movie about a woman I'd never heard of, who I now consider one of the most inspiring people I've ever not yet met. Diagnosed at age 4 with autism - not Asperger's, but full-on, spinning in circles, extremely worried about change, afraid of sliding glass doors, autism - nevertheless, Temple Grandin went on to become one of the world's experts in her chosen field, as well as showing people that they had seriously underestimated and failed to understand children with her condition. She is a living hero who also happens to be a professor at Colorado State University (in my very town, no less!).

Apparently, her different perspective allowed her to see with fresh eyes how animals reacted to the practices slaughterhouses and cattle stockyards employed, and to completely redesign them to allow animals the most possible dignity through the process from field to um, freezer. She has been quoted as saying, "Nature is cruel, but we don't have to be," - a profound and true statement if I ever heard one. I can't find the quote now, but I believe that the movie said that 60% of slaughterhouses now use her methods. I wonder what she thinks of the practices employed by big meat processing operations these days, like Tyson, and others - like the sort of factory farming that leaves cattle pumped full of antiobiotics and penned in narrowly side by side, never seeing the sun - the kind of thing that the movie Food Inc. brought to the public consciousness. I do know though, that to find out what Ms. Grandin thinks on many other issues, including some very sensible autism/parenting advice, you have only to look at her website.

If you haven't seen it yet, I invite you all to watch Temple Grandin. It's an excellent film, and a real eye-opener.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Time to switch

Since this is a currently active meme, I've decided to switch to the Friday 5, rather than the Thursday ? meme. This week's is called A Stitch in Time. I'd love it if you, readers, answered questions in the comments too!

1.What was your first wristwatch like?
2.What lately seems to have been a thief of time?
3.What were yesterday’s quietest five minutes like?
4.In what way have you lately been saving time?
5.We are often charged hourly rates for labor, but we never get to reciprocate in kind when promised completion times don’t match actual completion. If you could bill people for the time you spend waiting, what would be a reasonable amount?

1. I have no idea. I want to say that is was digital, and probably from a Happy Meal or something similar. And I think that it had a cartoon character on it. Rainbow Brite, maybe?

2. Playing video games. And watching tv. And all those fun things where you consume rather than produce, your fun.

3. Sleeping? And the first few minutes when I just wake up, and check the internet on my iPhone - Facebook, email, Salon.com, maybe play a little Words With Friends. Try to convince myself that I'm awake.

4. I haven't really, because I just got a new job - working in the reading program at a local high school. And now I'm busier than ever! But having more fun and feeling more productive than I have in ages. It's the end of the week, and I'm actually looking forward to next work week already! You know you have the right job when that happens.

5. How about if you pay more to never wait? That might be better. Though bad for the finances. How about if I agree to wait for an extra day or week, in exchange for a drastically reduced fee? I could deal with that.

How about you guys? I am watching Portlandia right now. It's not bad, but all of my favorite shows this season (other than The Big Bang Theory) are suspense, rather than comedy. Alcatraz is very good so far. Welcome back to tv, Hugo! What's your favorite spring season tv so far?

Saturday, January 14, 2012

The Suburban Yoga experience

This amazing video was created by my brother, Jack Workman, who is an outstanding yoga teacher and yogi, despite being only 17 years old.



I invite everyone to check out The Suburban Yoga Experience, a very crafty video that Jack and a friend and fellow yoga student, Amanda Cruz, have created, or, if you are in the Fort Collins/Loveland area, drop by one of Jack's classes at Old Town Yoga or Monk Yoga.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Your Treat of the Week

Here's another recipe for you this week. My grandmother made this one just last weekend for a family party, before heading back to Ohio. It was a big hit with our crew, and your family might like it too!

Sweet Potato Casserole

For Casserole:
5 large sweet potatoes
1/4 cup brown sugar
1 tb. pumpkin pie spice
1 can evaporated milk
enough milk to fill up the same can again
2 eggs, beaten

For Topping:
1/2 cup brown sugar
1/2 cup flour
1 stick butter
1 1/2 cup chopped pecans

Whipped cream or Cool Whip (optional)

Bake the sweet potatoes in the oven or cook in the microwave until soft. Mash them. Mix with other filling ingredients. Pour into a 9x13" pan. Mix topping ingredients together and sprinkle over filling. Bake at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for 25 minutes or until a knife inserted comes out clean. Serve with whipped cream.

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Why The Sims 2 is still awesome



I haven't blogged in days, and since this is partially due to the arrival of a certain game, I thought maybe this game deserves a post of its own. So...today's post is dedicated to 'Why the Sims 2 is Still Awesome'. After I got a laptop for Christmas, I found that I had an unredeemed Amazon gift certificate languishing in my e-mail! We can't have that, so the gift certificate is spent, and I am once again in possession of one of my favorite old games from my other computer.

If you have played this game before, or know a little about video games, at this point you may say, "But hasn't Sims 3 been out for a long time? Why play an old game?" Here's why:

1. If you play a slightly older game on your snazzy new laptop, it will run really, really well, and do things it didn't do the first time through, when you were running it with your so-so older computer. It plays videos that weren't there before. The objects inside the house look almost realistic, and can be viewed up close or from very far away with the smooth touch of a button. It's so much more fun to play things that are working propertly. (Unfortunately, this perk doesn't apply to really old games, like Princess Maker 2, for instance, which won't run because it's DOS-based.)

2. If you've already collected all of the expansions for a game, it's so much more fun to only have to install them, or buy one lost disk and install them, than to buy seven more new games! And less costly too!

3. Ok, so that's why version 2 is better than version 3 - Why play the Sims at all? Because it's like running your own tv show. Or like an exercise in group psychology - if you get a bunch of little people together and give them just what they want, what will they do with that? I'm not sure how realistic it is, but it's fun food for thought.

4. Ok, this is a scatter-brained post - but I'd like to mention, too, why I like the actual game mechanic of 2 better than 3. In 3, the creators became too smart for their own good. They said, "Wait a minute! We'd like to create a game that is true to life, but this game isn't so realistic. When people are satisfied, or unhappy, that's usually temporary!" So they came up with what they call a 'moodlet' - a temporary state of mind that affects your character's mood. They also, rather than having four clear goals all the time for your character, keep sending you goal options that you can choose to accept or not. I find that this simultaneously gives me too much power over my characters and not enough. Too much, because who am I to tell them what their goals are? It's much more fun to maintain the illusion of independently thinking computer creatures who have their own goals, thanks, no matter what I'd like them to do. And not enough, because - what if I don't like those goals and decide to hold out for better ones? Then my character is just walking around aimlessly.

As for moodlets - version 2 has what they call a lifetime achievement bar. When you fulfill their goals, either long-term or their one short-term goal, it fills up the bar so that it goes from almost empty and red, to full and shiny silver. I like to see that - tangible proof of their little microchip satisfaction. If their good mood is going to go away tomorrow, that's kind of sad for them. It doesn't work for me. I can temporarily satisfy people in real life. If I'm going to satisfy fake people, by golly it ought to last!

And that's my 2 cents, for what it's worth. Anyway, it's a great game, and you should check it out. Even in the new version, if that's more your cup of tea. I'll stick with my old one.

Monday, January 2, 2012

Let it snow!



It is almost too late, but I think it's never really too late for cookies, so I am posting one of our family's favorite Christmas cookie recipes today - one that happens to be my favorite recipe anywhere, hands down. It's a bit rich, but quick and easy, and everyone I've ever fed it to has loved it. So here goes:

Snowballs
1 cup chocolate chips
1/3 cup evaporated milk
1 1/4 cup powdered sugar
1/2 cup chopped walnuts
coconut

Combine chocolate and milk in a saucepan over medium heat until chocolate has melted and mixture has combined. Remove from stove and stir in powdered sugar and walnuts. Let cool in the refrigerator for half an hour or so. Spooning out teaspoon-sized clumps, form them into ping pong ball-sized balls, and roll in coconut. Put back in the fridge for a few hours until you can pick them up without getting chocolaty. Enjoy!

It's basically the world's easiest homemade nut fudge, with bonus coconut. These are long gone from our house. Maybe it's time to make more?